Originally posted by hachiroku-fc3s
View Post
i dont in any way believe a driver should be given the advantage in tandem only if he makes more smoke. but, as an example, Round 2 FD in Atlanta, Forsberg v Millen. when leading AND giving chase, Millen had substantially less angle, and hardly any smoke. the physics of the Solstice are obvious, its light, quick, nimble, and has tons of grip. this is why the majority of Millen's wins this season made me wonder how he won. alot of times, that car would just rocket around the course almost like time attack, and in doing so create a massive gap between the chasing car while Rhys lead. the reason for him being victorious was that gap. when giving chase, he'd stick right on the rear bumper to the lead car but hardly initiate drift. same with Tyler McQuarries Porsche in Jersey, but not as shallow. that cars just stupid fast. both of those cars are exeptional, and im aware that it was their first season driving them, but their victories were just too questionable to me.
truth be told, if smoke were that big of judging point, i could see the speeds decreasing drastically because its easier to maintain a slide with bookoos of wheelspin and angle, but to see gobbs of smoke pooring out after a 70 or 80mph entry, dude, thats just cool. and it adds to the overall impact.
thats what brings me to my amateur event comparo. the tracks are smaller, tires arent nearly as wide, and cars arent as powerful. and theres usually not as much smoke which is why, to me, that its good that the amount of smoke is not a judging point, but when its there, it makes for a better show.
smoke is, just as you said earlier, a byproduct. and it seems that the more speed and angle the driver carries into a slide, the more the smoke. the better the look. and i love drivers that have that sorta style.
Comment