Which of these (5.0, 2nd Gen F-Body) do you guys think would make the best economical drifter? With a 5.0 you have power and huge aftermarket support but have to invest in better control arms suspension pieces to get good handling and braking. Now with a 2nd Gen F-Body you get a tourqe arm to control the rear axle, plus better handling, but then you have to deal with the 200hp 305, and fewer parts to choose from. I'm a Ford guy but I think the F-Body may be easier in the long run because you already have handling from the factory, plus it seems that there are more nice Z's and 'Birds than 5.0s. Whatdya you guys think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
5.0 vs 2nd gen F-Body
Collapse
X
-
get what you reall like hotchkis makes some truely killer and i maean killer parts for both even the local rednecks know a good thing when they see it well if it involes the mulletmobile get some summit racing and jegs catalogs and go through them alot to look for parts and get a few mustang and f body mags you might be able to get them from the library and just spend some off time researching them if nothing else you can get to be like me and mouth off on them around the unwashed heathen masses EG the rednecks
Comment
-
I'm impartial, but for drifting I would say that F-body wins hands down.
SUre a 5.0 would oblitorate the 305 any day in straigfht line, but as far as I'm concerned handling is more important than power any day. The higher line of GM motors like LS's and LT's make enormous amounts of power as well and can be swapped in without much trouble. Even if you went as far as to get a crate motor you wouldn't be spending that much more than you would on lowering and suspension on the Fox. Even with the stock motor you could seriousally improve pewrformance with bolt-ons and weight reduction. CRAZY_Hawaiian is the resident F-body guru here and he could telly uo all about increasing power and handling and what costs you'd be looking at...
Car Craft has an article about buying low-buck performance, and both of the cars you mentoined are in there. I'd suggest you check it out at the bookstore or PM me and I'll scan it for you.
-MR
Comment
-
I'd say it depends on what options the 2nd Gen F-Body has. The base model 2nd gen stuff might not be any better than the standard fox body suspension stuff. So if the only 2nd gens you can find come with base model stuff, the stang might be a better choice. When checking out the 2nd gens, look for the RPO codes. These are usually found in the glove box on a sticker (will have like 50 3 digit codes). Make sure the VIN on the sticker matches the VIN of the car. The RPO's you want are:
F41 (Performance suspension)
G80 (Positraction aka LSD)
J50 (the good brakes)
ZQ9 (good rear end gearing)
or best of all
Z28 (includes all of the above)
WS6 (only found on 1979 Firebirds, but best suspension)
If you want more info on the 2nd gen''s, here is a pretty good information website: http://www.nastyz28.com/2gcog/stegmiller/ but they seem to leave out the firebirds. Here's another good website with alot of good chassis info: http://www.nastyz28.com/camaro/zsusp.html and finally, probably the most usefull info on setting up a 2nd gen to handle (as in SCCA, etc) http://racingarticles.com/article_racing-9.html
I'm not really a 2nd gen guy, so I dont know the full capabilities of the 2nd gen platform. From what I've seen, the Mustang has a much larger aftermarket support as far as road racing related suspension pieces and weight reduction. The Mustang is a lot lighter from the factory and probably has better weight balance in stock form. I'm sure the 2nd gens also have aftermarket suspension support, but I dont know where to find the stuff.
On a side note, my mentor (helping me build my drift car) will soon be building a 2nd gen drift car. His name is Brian and he used to race dirt track (not to mentioned he's a very knowledgeable mechanic and fabricator). He really likes the new sport of drifting. His car is a 1970 Firebird with the F41 suspension. He'll be running a mild 350 (for now) with the M22 tranny and a 12 bolt rearend. His car is solid!!
Comment
-
I'm sort of shame to admit it, but I do have quite a few of the RPO's from all generations Camaro's memorized. I dont know why I do that kind of stuff, but whenever I came across usefull codes doing any reading, I end up remembering it. Wish that stuff happened when I was back in HighSchool doing my Spanish Homework! Doh! But all that info I posted was verified on those websites I posted, which I found in about 4 minutes using google. So I'm not really THAT knowledgeable, I just read too much stuff and remember what to search for. I looked through all the 2nd gen stuff when looking for info for my mentor's 70 Firebird. Just like some have said, google is the answer to every question in the world. For example, if you type in 'camaros shoudnt drift' it will tell you 'Did you mean: camaros should drift' and ever since I saw that I've been a believer. Hahah, but nah seriously, knowing the RPO's kicks butt because you can instantly spot the cars for sale with the best options. I've settled for base model cars before and I figgure why settle for less? Do some research and find the best bang for your buck. I say thats the only way I could have gotten my budget project driftable for a total investment of around $3300 inc the car. The stock FE2 suspension (one level above F41) drifts great. And the stock motor puts down over 300 ft/lbs of torque. Look how much smoke it makes in my sig!! Weee!! hehehe
Comment
-
mranlet definietly scan that arcticle to me if ya want. I'm always reading stuff like that. And thanks for the chassis codes C.H. I'll remember that. I've got 2 main questions.
1. How much do you have to invest in the F-Body's suspension to get it driftable. The Mustang takes alot of suspension parts to make up for it's geometry problems and it seems like the F-Body has better factory geometry.
2. Do you know what year the 2nd gens got the LT1?
C.H. I really hope you can get your Project Domestic Drifter info up, cause I'm really interested what you and revimit have done to bring the F-Body's suspension to driftable spec. I'm interested in doing the most with the least cash so when I crash it I won't be out thousands of dollars
P.S. CH your Red F-body with the Mesh rims is the best lookin 2nd gen I ever seen. That could definitely get into HOTROD magazine.
Comment
-
Mustangs have always outhandled Camaros from the factory; my 5.0s have outrun more IROCs through my canyons than Usama has hidey holes. I don't possibly see how that elongated nose and stubby rear are conducive to drifting. With the 2nd gen F-Body the problem that I would see ( beside that nose/tail ratio thing) is sway. All these things can be adjusted, yes. From my experience, the majoriy of 5.0s that you'll be looking at already have suspension work done anyways and usually carry KONi adjustables as well as that good ol' Ford rearend. Now, this is the 1st car site I've been to that I don't have to deal with the Ford/Chevy wars, so I'm not trying to start that. Just relating my opinions..........
BTW - WILL ANYONE PLAY AUTO MODELLISTA ONLINE WITH ME PLEEEEASE!!!!!
Comment
-
Oh I think we might be confused a bit. The 2nd Gen F-Bodies were from 1970 to 1981. The 3rd Gen F-Bodies are from 1982-1992. All of my Camaro's are 3rd gen's (2 89's and 1 91). If you were talking about 3rd Gen's (82-92 F-Bodies), then I can provide you with a bit more information. You will want an 87-92 3rd gen because it'll probably have TPI (and stock roller cam), 4 wheels discs became an option, and the pulley's were converted to serpentine. Look for any top model version, so either Z28's or IROC-Z's and you will probably end up with some good options. Definately get a car with the TPI intake (LB9 or L98) and avoid the L03 TBI. 4 wheel discs is always a plus, though the handbrake works better on the drum brake rearends. Check the RPO's for FE2 to spot the performance factory suspension. And although very rare, the 1LE option was the factory race prepped version, so if you spot that definately get it. You should also check all RS cars for the B4C RPO which was the police car RPO. These cars came with alot of 1LE parts (inc the good brakes), so they would make great drift cars (although about as rare as the 1LE's). Any of these cars (top model with FE2, 1LE, or B4C) would make great drift cars in completely stock form. Base model suspension will need some modification to get it driftable (check the pics of my old stock maroon red 89 RS in the website gallery to see the body roll on stock base model suspension). If you check out the club website, and click on the budget project link you can see a small write-up I did on the IROC budget project. The car is a completely stock IROC with the FE2 suspension, and the only mod being an aftermarket panhard bar. You can see lots of pics of the car drifting in the gallery (its the green car in my sig). Total investment was around $3300 and the car was track ready (this also included a paintjob which you dont really need). Its definately possible to drift a 3rd gen on a budget, and the stock stuff is good enough to drift if you find a car with the right options. If you want to see what mods Revlimit and I have done to our 3rd Gen's, check out the driver profiles on the website. We included a bunch of mod's we've done (or are still doing) to our track cars. These are not things you need to drift (stock can get it done), but these things will make the car better suited for drifting in our opinions. I think your first mod for a drift Camaro should be a set of Subframe Connectors.
The LT1 motors (or Gen II SBC's) came in the 93-97 4th Gen F-Bodies and 93-97 Corvettes. These can be swapped into the 3rd Gen F-Bodies, but honestly I think you'll do fine with the stock 3rd Gen Stuff (Gen 1 SBC Engines). The TPI is a torque design, and thats pretty much what you need to induce oversteer with throttle. So the TPI intakes are good choices for drifting IMO, although if you dont want to stick with EFI, a Carb will unlock ALOT of power.
As for the whole Chevy vs Ford thing, I think it depends on personal preferance. Either platform has cars that will drift well, and I've tried both brands. Both of them can be good drift platforms.
P.S. Thanks for the props on my 91Z. I recently got my hands on a set of 3rd gen specific twin turbo manifolds, so hopefully I can get my turbo swap going pretty soon (the supercharger will end up on the drift car hehe).Last edited by CrazyHawaiian; 03-29-2004, 10:32 PM.
Comment
-
Yeah I meant 3rd gen like yours. It sounds like I'd be looking at a TPI Z28 then to get all the goodies?
It looks right now that the F-Body has alittle better balance of power/handling/brakes from the factory than the Mustang does, because the 5.0 never had rear discs from the factory, plus the F-Bodies don't have the snap oversteer like the Mustangs. The main advantage the 5.0 has to me is that I know the aftermarket for the car reasonably well due to reading about it for nearly 10 years. But I'll have to do more research before I make my decision.
Btw I am looking forward to seein that Z28 done. The overall look with the deep-dish mesh wheels really gives it modern stance, plus the simple candy paint is money on that car. Add a big front mount or billet grille and V-mount intercooler. Maybe even do the fireball trick with the exhasut. A car with both JDM AND V8 attitude. Now how cool is that!!
Keep up the good work CH and please get the forums up on PowerSlideways.com!!
P.S. 400hp on the Camaroku!!!! Gotta love it!!
Comment
Comment