I figured I'd start a new topic here in the hopes that we can come up with a universal definition of "drift".....
Now, what I want to know is what makes a drift a drift and not something else.....what conditions are required for a drift to have occured.
Here is my definition (usually simpler is best)
Drift---to be in a state of oversteer; an oversteered condition
Here is the definition from driftsession.com
Drift---To cause a vehicle to exceed its tires' limits of adhesion, exhibiting a lateral slip, resulting in an oversteered condition.
Notice that the more conditional statements you add to this definition, the narrower the definition becomes. For instance, both definitions above never mention anything about control or driver's intentions. ---this means that a drift can occur quite accidentally...
Drift, the noun and the verb do not require any conditional statements regarding the driver's ability, technique or state of mind ---actually, they dont even require a driver at all.
Neither do the definitions require any conditional statements regarding the vehicle type, layout, capabiities, number of wheels etc (actually the 2nd def requires tires)----this means that motorcycles, go carts, minivans, bicycles, wagons etc can drift.
Also note that there are no conditional statements regarding how a drift must be started or maintained. Nor are there any conditional statements regarding duration, style, acceleration, etc etc.
COLOR=orangered]If you think that you have a definition that more accurately captures the fundamental nature of drifting post it up.[/COLOR]
Now, what I want to know is what makes a drift a drift and not something else.....what conditions are required for a drift to have occured.
Here is my definition (usually simpler is best)
Drift---to be in a state of oversteer; an oversteered condition
Here is the definition from driftsession.com
Drift---To cause a vehicle to exceed its tires' limits of adhesion, exhibiting a lateral slip, resulting in an oversteered condition.
Notice that the more conditional statements you add to this definition, the narrower the definition becomes. For instance, both definitions above never mention anything about control or driver's intentions. ---this means that a drift can occur quite accidentally...
Drift, the noun and the verb do not require any conditional statements regarding the driver's ability, technique or state of mind ---actually, they dont even require a driver at all.
Neither do the definitions require any conditional statements regarding the vehicle type, layout, capabiities, number of wheels etc (actually the 2nd def requires tires)----this means that motorcycles, go carts, minivans, bicycles, wagons etc can drift.
Also note that there are no conditional statements regarding how a drift must be started or maintained. Nor are there any conditional statements regarding duration, style, acceleration, etc etc.
COLOR=orangered]If you think that you have a definition that more accurately captures the fundamental nature of drifting post it up.[/COLOR]
Comment