Originally posted by PeakPerformance
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FORMULA D Rule Changes...
Collapse
X
-
VTS sheets sound like a great way to start the respect this sport deserves!!!!!Last edited by stedriftward; 07-05-2008, 08:43 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Despite everyting...seriously. Let ALL the questionable cars in the series right now run the way they are no matter what's on it. There may be some fresh cars coming into play at this upcoming Las Vegas event. I think everyting is going to fall between the radical Scion, and a regular Corolla...Originally posted by OldSkool510 View PostThe Scion wasn't picked on as much because it didn't pose a threat to many of the drivers and teams. However, the Skyline has the ability to keep up with the big boys of drifting. What advantage does it actually gain with the set-up? I know rules are rules, but the rules need to be clear with no loopholes in it.
The Scion still hasn't been able to properly stretch its legs. Great driver...car put together by all the right people, and from what I've been told...properly funded. I'm sure this car will be something to keep an eye out for.
VTS sheets...disclose everything. Maybe someone out there wants to build a RWD Scion. The VTS sheet should disclose whatever parts they used....even if they are custom parts. Doesn't matter...VTS sheet it, list it all out, and let's all go drift.
Corvette, GTO, Skyline, Scion...all good to me. 350Z's with whatever's under them...doesn't matter. Keep your pimp hand strong fella's.Last edited by courantcom; 07-04-2008, 10:59 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
The Scion wasn't picked on as much because it didn't pose a threat to many of the drivers and teams. However, the Skyline has the ability to keep up with the big boys of drifting. What advantage does it actually gain with the set-up? I know rules are rules, but the rules need to be clear with no loopholes in it.
Leave a comment:
-
helloooooo
Is anyone reading what SA Drift said in his earlier post?
"Maybe we should be running a Stagea instead? Same chassis, same engine, same front strut suspension, same rear suspension....wait, that's exactly what we're running now? So if we call it a Stagea is it cool?"
Eddie? Ron B? Jim? Ryan? PG? Bueller? Bueller? anyone? anyone?
I'm sorry for talking *Censored**Censored**Censored**Censored* but sometimes things like this are so irritating to read. Can anyone answer the above question???? FD??? Are you going to be blatantly arrogant about this and not answer cause you know you can't even do it???? Is this not the most clear, obvious, logical reason why you have a major problem here? Whether or not some teams contact you for a build on a car, you are going to disallow the R34 even though you can't answer the above question...but you will allow a Corvette to run coilover suspension, a Pontiac to run NISSAN suspension, and to top it off a tC that has no business drifting in the first place??? The car is sold as a FF car for crying out loud....
wow that's super OEM.... riiiiiiggght????!!!! Oh but wait it's the same chassis as this car that is sold in Japan...blah blah blah. Picking on the Scion might be beating a dead horse by now but it just goes to show your double standard here...i'm not bringing it up for a legal or not legal issue...just to show how much of a double standard you are enforcing on the SA R34.
*Censored**Censored**Censored**Censored*in hell it's July 4th.....back to more BBQ and beer....ta ta
Leave a comment:
-
People definitely don't like the word UNIONOriginally posted by courantcom View PostAfter seeing how people react on this forum, it's hard to say if a driver's union would suceed. The example that was introduced regarding a driver's union was from a racing sanctioning body that has team budgets in excess of $100,000,000. Budgets involving drifring are just a mere fraction of that. If we think we're playing with big money now, well, there are other forms of racing where what a drifter would spend in a year would just pay for enough plane tickets and hotel rooms for the team of the other.
Here's an opportunity right here, and right now for the drivers to come together and approach Formula D with one voice to just allow the SA Drift entry to compete without penalty. If SA Drift was an underdog, I'd say the chances of this happening are good. I'm certain things would happen very quickly if suddenly, no drivers wanted to drive for Las Vegas. Imagine how it would all turn out...all drivers in the paddock...none willing to start their cars and go on the course, until they were made happy. It's a fantasy, perhaps...but also maybe a disaster to others. However, SA Drift's entry is viewed as a threat. It should, however, be viewed as a pioneer as Super Autobacs itself, or Autobacs, have quite honestly been pioneers in their own right. There are big names in this thread -- shop owners that have been in the game since the early 90's.
Don't forget...there is a representative of a "shop" that's been here long before you learned that a car had 4 wheels. Now I know that doesn't really mean much...but I do remember someone saying that we should be kind to our elders.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MonkeySlide View PostI knew this was going to happen sooner or later...
Behold children...we've made autoblog: http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/04/d...a-d-rule-book/
The article spells it all out...
and the whole point...there must be a list available to competitors outlining the approved components for all competing vehicles. No such list is available, however. That means teams have no method of verifying that other competitors are following the rules, other than the fact an entry passed Formula D's own tech inspection.
The rules become particularly unclear when other vehicles are allowed to run with obviously altered suspension setups. 350Zs have altered the mounting points of their rear axles and Chevrolet Corvettes have converted from leaf springs to coilovers. Hopefully, Formula D can learn from this tussle and develop a fair and documented method of approving vehicle,s rather than leaving everyone in the dark.
Leave a comment:
-
After seeing how people react on this forum, it's hard to say if a driver's union would suceed. The example that was introduced regarding a driver's union was from a racing sanctioning body that has team budgets in excess of $100,000,000. Budgets involving drifring are just a mere fraction of that. If we think we're playing with big money now, well, there are other forms of racing where what a drifter would spend in a year would just pay for enough plane tickets and hotel rooms for the team of the other.Originally posted by Tracy View PostNow THAT is a touchy subject, as I have found. Although I agree....not with all of what you have said in here, just this part. I think it's better to have a "discussion" about things like this as an organized group of drivers rather than having a public trial. BUT that being said, when people feel like they have run out of options it's kind of natural for them to make it public as a last resort type of thing (lots of y'all know that I have been there more than once in my career). A drivers organization would be a way better way to handle things like this. Especially with drifting still being in the growing stages.
I hope it all works out amicably and that we all gain something from the situation in the long run. Growing pains hurt
That's why they call them pains.
Here's an opportunity right here, and right now for the drivers to come together and approach Formula D with one voice to just allow the SA Drift entry to compete without penalty. If SA Drift was an underdog, I'd say the chances of this happening are good. I'm certain things would happen very quickly if suddenly, no drivers wanted to drive for Las Vegas. Imagine how it would all turn out...all drivers in the paddock...none willing to start their cars and go on the course, until they were made happy. It's a fantasy, perhaps...but also maybe a disaster to others. However, SA Drift's entry is viewed as a threat. It should, however, be viewed as a pioneer as Super Autobacs itself, or Autobacs, have quite honestly been pioneers in their own right. There are big names in this thread -- shop owners that have been in the game since the early 90's.
Don't forget...there is a representative of a "shop" that's been here long before you learned that a car had 4 wheels. Now I know that doesn't really mean much...but I do remember someone saying that we should be kind to our elders.Last edited by courantcom; 07-04-2008, 06:45 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I love you man...you know I do.Originally posted by deadpirate View PostThe team started out in japan, takatori and kawamra(the mechanic)have been together as a team for years
^^ this seems fair, where is formula D??
Leave a comment:
-
Well, see...that's the thing. What if SA showed up to an event with the suspension back to factory R34, and gained approval for that setup on that day. Could they THEN ask for approval for a modified front suspension setup? Do you think it would be granted, or would it just be shot down because of how all this came about already. I hope everyone can see that all of this will just push more and more towards the realm of being biased.Originally posted by tyndago View PostPublicity. No one wants publicity when they do wrong. Is Formula Drift in the wrong ? Why do they want to keep everything quiet ?
Are they asking Peak and Bergenholtz Racing to come on here as "damage control" ? Spin control ? Both of them have admitted to knowing Formula Drift people well. Bergenholtz Racing even said that "I would assume they are taken into consideration by the powers that be and a difference will be made. Believe me they are listening." Just an assumption ? They both have only ever posted on here in this thread...right ?
I am still just an outsider looking in, and I still do not like what I see. I see favoritism and biased rule enforcement. I see an organization wanting to sweep the decisions they made under the rug.
I am not sure that people here understand that a decision regarding this car was made about a week before this went public. This was not the first avenue that Team SA seeked. When you are treated unfairly, where do you go ?
It seems like most peoples opinions on here is put your head down, take it and move on. Lets just admit, that only works when its done to someone else, and not you. Not me. After all, you can never get a Nissan Skyline GT-R legal for the US either. Not according to what tons of people told me. Why try, the government says you can't, so just move on. I have fought all the government agencies over rules and regulations. Won some, lost some.
So , now what ? In what configuration will the car show up for Vegas ? I was not going to go to Vegas , July in Vegas... 100+ at 3 am, doesn't sound too fun. However I think I might want to show up now.
If I go...I'll be the guy in the I heart coil over Corvettes , and S14 shocked GTO's shirt. Maybe " I'm pre-approved". No one try and turn too Rodney King on anyone.
There is still one big question out there... "If Team SA seeked "pre-approval" on the strut type front suspension , would they have received "pre-approval". Or is that a tree falls in the forest question?
It wouldn't suprise me one bit if I didn't feel all that welcome by the staff and a few other racers in Las Vegas because of all this. Asking basic questions like if I would need a special parking pass to bring in my own car, or asking for a schedule may result in an unfavorable reaction. People will be people. They always shove back when pushed into a corner. The same can be said with SA Drift.
The unfavortism could easily stretch into other realms...from mistreating the rest of the people I transport for, all the way down to how the cars are judged when they go through the course. At that point, who's going to be the judge? The crowd could easily be in an uproar, but Formula D just wouldn't be able to hear it....or just won't hear it.
Granted that misleading information may have been given to FD staff in the beginning about how some R34's came with strut type suspension, at this point, is the juice worth the squeeze for both parties?
The touchiest of touchy subjects and topics found on this thread are always carefully avoided and a new subject is brought up. I've always thought of it as spin control as all of a sudden, it comes up. New people out of the woodwork sign on, and start posting extremely profound posts. Big names...with big histories. More and more inconsistencies is the only way I can see it. They were never there in the past, and suddenly, here they are now. Maybe it's how message boards work...or maybe it's just how this thread works. Either way, I'm glad they're on here and voiced their thoughts. It helps me get to know them, even though I must try to read their true intentions through a computer screen.
Maybe there are still enough people out there thinking that if all this is just left alone, it will all just magically go away.
I've noticed this thread gain momentum, and lose momentum. I thought about the topic of this thread for a little bit, wondering if it still applies. The first post was leading towards something else, but through the act of discussion, it has taken an entirely new life form -- but still hovers around the same general topic. It's RULE CHANGES. The rules need to be addressed, and should be addressed immediately.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedwhat?! i just bought a plane ticket to vegas......Originally posted by PeakPerformance View PostGoodie bag is for Blaze! Not for everyone on drifting.com
Leave a comment:
-
Now THAT is a touchy subject, as I have found. Although I agree....not with all of what you have said in here, just this part. I think it's better to have a "discussion" about things like this as an organized group of drivers rather than having a public trial. BUT that being said, when people feel like they have run out of options it's kind of natural for them to make it public as a last resort type of thing (lots of y'all know that I have been there more than once in my career). A drivers organization would be a way better way to handle things like this. Especially with drifting still being in the growing stages.Originally posted by _PG_ View PostF1 has the GPDA (Grand Prix Drivers Association), and most other major series have something similar. For sure Formula Drift drivers should do the same. Make your voices heard in the right way about all issues: Safety, Regs, Judging, etc.
I hope it all works out amicably and that we all gain something from the situation in the long run. Growing pains hurt
That's why they call them pains.
Last edited by Tracy; 07-04-2008, 04:51 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Publicity. No one wants publicity when they do wrong. Is Formula Drift in the wrong ? Why do they want to keep everything quiet ?Originally posted by courantcom View Postwent to court. The court let the cops go, and the Los Angeles Riots started... The cops went back to court, and were convicted at that time, after the result of a massive public unrest. The big bad police was wrong. Had this particular incident not been brought to the public's attention, Rodney King would have just been thrown out of a moving car in front of his house, and nobody would have ever looked back.
The whole key to what brought justice to Rodney King was that the information that I'm CERTAIN the police wanted to keep quiet was made public by someone who thought that everyone needed to know. Hmmm...kinda like this entire thread, huh.
Are they asking Peak and Bergenholtz Racing to come on here as "damage control" ? Spin control ? Both of them have admitted to knowing Formula Drift people well. Bergenholtz Racing even said that "I would assume they are taken into consideration by the powers that be and a difference will be made. Believe me they are listening." Just an assumption ? They both have only ever posted on here in this thread...right ?
I am still just an outsider looking in, and I still do not like what I see. I see favoritism and biased rule enforcement. I see an organization wanting to sweep the decisions they made under the rug.
I am not sure that people here understand that a decision regarding this car was made about a week before this went public. This was not the first avenue that Team SA seeked. When you are treated unfairly, where do you go ?
It seems like most peoples opinions on here is put your head down, take it and move on. Lets just admit, that only works when its done to someone else, and not you. Not me. After all, you can never get a Nissan Skyline GT-R legal for the US either. Not according to what tons of people told me. Why try, the government says you can't, so just move on. I have fought all the government agencies over rules and regulations. Won some, lost some.
So , now what ? In what configuration will the car show up for Vegas ? I was not going to go to Vegas , July in Vegas... 100+ at 3 am, doesn't sound too fun. However I think I might want to show up now.
If I go...I'll be the guy in the I heart coil over Corvettes , and S14 shocked GTO's shirt. Maybe " I'm pre-approved". No one try and turn too Rodney King on anyone.
There is still one big question out there... "If Team SA seeked "pre-approval" on the strut type front suspension , would they have received "pre-approval". Or is that a tree falls in the forest question?Last edited by tyndago; 07-04-2008, 04:49 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Goodie bag is for Blaze! Not for everyone on drifting.comOriginally posted by david_kay View Postif we cant make it to vegas can the goodie bag be mailed?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedif we cant make it to vegas can the goodie bag be mailed?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: