FC RX7 specs...N/A reliable???

[Driftin180sx]

I had a periphrial Port 13B in my 90 GXL it was alot of fun 300WHP at 14000RPM. The car was loud but so much fun. We also have a 700WHP 3rd gen RX7 which was in D-Sport this month.

[f8ldzz]

Originally posted by Driftin180sx
I had a periphrial Port 13B in my 90 GXL it was alot of fun 300WHP at 14000RPM. The car was loud but so much fun. We also have a 700WHP 3rd gen RX7 which was in D-Sport this month.

I call your *Censored**Censored**Censored**Censored**Censored* *Censored**Censored**Censored*.

[theflatlander]

^ i'm gonna have to agree.

[Darkstar]

14k rpm? HOW?! Man alive, did you put a Hayabusa engine inside and twin-turbocharged it or what?

[SidewaysGts]

yes and my 86 revs up to 11,000 and makes exactly 240 hp.. did i tell you i can drift with a cup of water and not spill a drop? i have to or i may damage my pizzas during delivery runs.

[Darkstar]

Yeah, and your car has "Fujiwara Tofu Shop" marks on the side... I think I know it from somewhere.

Let's get back to reality guys!

[theflatlander]

a 300hp PP13B revving 14k is believable(Jesus Padilla revs his 16k) but an 18yr old owning one is highly unlikely, unless mom and dad are paying for it. Until i see pics of this car i'm gonna call B.S.

[SidewaysGts]

Thats different.. and u know it



an FB with a 20b... come on...

[twcfc3s]

Originally posted by theflatlander
a 300hp PP13B revving 14k is believable(Jesus Padilla revs his 16k) but an 18yr old owning one is highly unlikely, unless mom and dad are paying for it. Until i see pics of this car i'm gonna call B.S.

i agree with you in everything that you wrote...a PP13b engine its like black widow poison....a moooora foooka killah thing!!

[Darkstar]

I've hear that the Mazda engineers did an experiment on a 12A or 13B, but that was some years ago. They were revving it more and more till the engine died. Do you know what did they reach? 34k rpm. 34000!!!

[tougeC]

holy crap!!! .. might as well be a jet engine...thats crazy.

[SidewaysGts]

Well think about it and the reason why is pretty obvious.

Piston engines as they move redirect their piston, ie up then down.

Rotaries, its just one constant direction in a circle (sort of a circle at least) so its speeds will rise up and up until something goes out

[Darkstar]

Yup, that's right. The rotor ends are sliding on the trochoid - shaped housing walls. And it gives (at least it should give - that's theory) the same power output as a conventional piston engine that has three times more cylinders than the number of rotors and two times bigger displacement. Reason? In a modern rotary, the rotor makes three processes at one time (for instance: while one rotor wall is burning the air/fuel mixture, the next one moves the exhaust to the exhaust port, and the other one sucks the air inside the chamber - that's why is it three times more efficient than a piston engine), and finishes the burning process during 360 degree eccentric shaft movement, whereas the four stroke engine makes it in 720... It's quite a different story with the two strokes, tough.

That's why I love rotaries... I also like Subaru boxer engines, but not because of that.

[SidewaysGts]

low cob